Legal Opinion

Prince v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 28, 1953No. 34443Published

1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.

The first special ground of the amended motion for a new trial complains of error in refusing to allow a police officer who was called to the scene of the shooting, to testify as to a statement of the defendant made immediately upon his arrival, which testimony would have been advantageous to the defendant. It was contended that the statement was a part of the res gestae, it being shown that the police officer arrived within a minute and a half or two minutes after he was notified of the shooting. The court ruled: “Well, that doesn’t show how long after the shooting. I don’t think it is…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mullis v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  2. State Highway Board v. WarthenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  3. Connor v. RainwaterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
  4. Bradford v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
  5. Dent v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API