Legal Opinion

Benjamin v. Chicago Transit Authority

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 19, 1977No. 62139PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice St Amos

Plaintiffs, Benjamin & Shapiro, instituted this action to recover an attorney’s fee from their client’s employer pursuant to section 5(b) of the Workmen’s Compensation Act. (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1973, ch. 48, par. 138.5(b).) They represented one Raymond Mason, an employee of the defendant, Chicago Transit (hereinafter “CTA”), in his claim for damages against a negligent third-party. A settlement was negotiated with the third-party’s insurer whereby Mason was paid *1,800 and from which defendant accepted *487.93 as reimbursement for workmen’s compensation benefits which Mason had received from defendant.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Fiorito v. JonesIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Baier v. State Farm Insurance Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Adams v. Jewel Companies, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Harrison Sheet Steel Co. v. LyonsIllinois Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Peoples Store of Roseland v. McKibbinIllinois Supreme Court · 1942

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ditland Plumbing, Inc. v. Milwaukee Electric Tool Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API