Legal Opinion

In re BioAge Labs, Inc., Securities Litigation

District Court, N.D. California

Decided October 30, 2025No. 3:25-cv-00196Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 IN RE BIOAGE LABS, INC., 10 Case No. 25-cv-00196-RS SECURITIES LITIGATION 11 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' 12 MOTION TO DISMISS WITH LEAVE TO AMEND 13 14 15 The Southeast Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (“SEPTA”), on behalf of itself and a 16 putative class of similarly situated investors, sued BioAge Labs and ten of its corporate officers 17 under two provisions of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. §§ 77k, o. SEPTA alleges that, in 18 the run-up to its initial public offering, BioAge misled investors by…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. v. SiracusanoSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. Omnicare, Inc. v. Laborers Dist. Council Constr. Industry Pension FundSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  5. Rubke v. Capitol Bancorp Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API