Universal City Studios Productions LLLP v. Bigwood
District Court, D. Maine
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
GENE CARTER, Senior District Judge.
The Court now has before it Universal City Studios Productions LLLP (“Univer sal”) and Paramount Pictures Corporation (“Paramount”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) Motion for Summary Judgment. Docket Item No. 16. Defendant Clint Bigwood has not responded to Plaintiffs’ Motion. For the reasons stated below, the Court will grant Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment.
I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
On December 15, 2005, Plaintiffs filed this action against Defendant for copyright…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McCarthy v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Atlantic Recording Corp. v. HowellDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2008
- Arista Records LLC v. DOES 1-27District Court, D. Maine · 2008
- BMG Rights Management (US) LLC v. Cox Communications, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2015
- ELEKTRA ENTERTAINMENT GROUP INC. v. CarterDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2009
- Cooper v. HarveyDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2015
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.