Legal Opinion

Williams v. Green

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided July 13, 1967No. C 66-237PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DON J. YOUNG, District Judge.

This case was previously before this Court in case No. C 66-93, 254 F.Supp. 245. In May of 1966, the petition for habeas corpus was dismissed because post-conviction proceedings in the state courts were still pending undisposed of. Those proceedings have since terminated adversely to petitioner, exhausting his remedies under the state law.

The serious complaint of the petitioner is that he was not represented by counsel at the time of his plea of guilty to an information for armed robbery.

Although the state post-conviction proceeding statutes provide for the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Carnley v. CochranSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. George W. Meadows v. E. L. Maxwell, Warden, Ohio PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1967
  4. DiMarco v. GreenDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1966
  5. Williams v. GreenDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1966

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bramlett v. PetersonDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1969
  2. Moneywatch Companies v. WilbersOhio Court of Appeals · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API