Legal Opinion

State v. Caylor

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 4, 1989No. 16053PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, Justice.

Appellant Dan Lee Caylor (Caylor) was convicted of aiding and abetting in the distribution of marijuana, contrary to SDCL 22-42-7.1 He appeals, alleging that (1) he was entitled to entry of a judgment of acquittal due to insufficiency of the evidence and (2) that the court committed reversible error in prohibiting Caylor from using a fifteen-year-old felony conviction to impeach the credibility of one of State’s witnesses. We affirm.

FACTS

Caylor and Timothy Bollack (Bollack) were jointly charged in a two-count indictment with Count 1 alleging that Bollack distributed marijuana…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. HuberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State v. AshkerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State v. BultSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. CookSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  5. State v. OlsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. LykkenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. ChristophersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. CorderSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. BeynonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. MartinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API