Legal Opinion

Cooley v. Air Methods Corporation

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided May 4, 2020No. 2:19-cv-00850Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Kenneth Cooley, et al., No. CV-19-00850-PHX-DLR 10 Plaintiffs, ORDER 11 v. 12 Air Methods Corporation, 13 Defendant. 14 15 16 Before the Court is Air Methods Corporation’s (“AMC”) motion for partial 17 summary judgment, which is fully briefed. (Docs. 137, 146, 151.) AMC’s motion is 18 denied.1 19 I. Background 20 AMC is an air ambulance company that provides emergency air medical transport 21 by helicopter to patients with life-threatening injuries and illnesses. (Doc. 137-1 at 5.) 22 Plaintiffs are hourly…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Reloynne K. Villiarimo Joseph Harvest v. Aloha Island Air, Inc., Dba Island Air Rosie Nenezich Richard HeeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  5. United States v. Georgia-Pacific CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API