Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Foster v. Buchanan, Unpublished Decision (4-26-2006)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 26, 2006No. 85962UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORIGINAL ACTION

JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION

{¶ 1} The relator, Ronald Foster, commenced this "Motion for a writ of mandamus" against the respondent, Judge A. Deane Buchanan of the Cleveland Heights Municipal Court, to obtain the following relief: (1) to compel Judge Buchanan to recuse himself; (2) to compel Judge Buchanan to rule on motions submitted on December 2, 2004; (3) to compel the assignment of Foster's underlying case(s) to a different judge; (4) to compel the transfer of the underlying case(s) from the municipal court to the common pleas court because the amount in controversy exceeds…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Pressley v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  2. State ex rel. Daggett v. GessamanOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  3. State ex rel. Ney v. NiehausOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State ex rel. Taylor v. GlasserOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  5. State ex rel. Keenan v. CalabreseOhio Supreme Court · 1994

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Walter v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. State ex rel. Allen v. SutulaOhio Court of Appeals · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API