Legal Opinion
O'Shatz v. Bailey
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided August 16, 1963No. Civ. A. No. 14369PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NORTHROP, District Judge.
In this action based on a rear-end collision, each defendant has moved to dismiss, primarily on the ground of lack of' venue. The complaint, as originally filed January 24,1963, contained the following averments: the plaintiff, a New York citizen now residing in the District of' Columbia, was driving on U. S. Route 40> in Maryland, near Aberdeen, on January 26, 1960, when the car ahead of him. driven by the defendant Frank Bailey negligently came to an abrupt stop; the plaintiff managed to stop his car in time-to avoid a collision, but a car being driven by defendant…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Goldlawr, Inc. v. HeimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Camp v. GressSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Giffin v. EnsignCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
- Champion Spark Plug Company v. KarchmarDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1960
- Viaggio v. FieldDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1959
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Erdmann v. ThomasNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- Kisch v. SkowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Wosepka v. DukartNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
- Samuel v. St. PierreSuperior Court of Guam · 1975