Legal Opinion

Wright v. Southern Ry. Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western North Carolina

Decided April 30, 1897PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DICK, District Judge.

(A civil action to recover damages for the death of plaintiff’s intestate by reason of the negligence of the defendant companies.) At the close of the plaintiff’s case, the counsel of defendants declined to introduce evidence in defense, and made a motion to the court for an instruction to the jury to render a verdict for the defendants on the issues of fact submitted to them. This motion is, in substance, a demurrer to the evidence, and admits the truth of the matters of fact shown by the testimony. As there is no conflict in the evidence of plaintiff, the question of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. BaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Northern Pacific Railroad v. HamblySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Central Railroad Company v. KeeganSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. Mason v. Richmond & Danville RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
  5. Kirk v. Atlanta & Charlotte Air-Line Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1886

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Swaney v. Peden Steel CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  2. Ch. & Ohio Ry. Co. v. Lang's Adm'xCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
  3. Jones v. Virginian Railway Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Ft. Smith W. R. Co. v. BlevinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. Colorado Fuel & Iron Co. v. MenapaceColorado Court of Appeals · 1901

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API