Legal Opinion

Judicial Conduct Commission v. Hagar

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 2017No. 20160283Published

1Opinion of the Court

SUSPENSION ORDERED

2Per curiam

[¶ 1] Richard L. Hagar, judge of the district court for the North Central Judicial District, filed exceptions to the Judicial Conduct Commission’s recommended findings that he violated provisions of the Code of Judicial Conduct by failing to diligently and promptly decide judicial matters assigned to him and by failing to work with the presiding judge. He also objects to the Commission’s recommended sanction. We conclude there is clear and convincing evidence Judge Hagar violated N.D. Code Jud. Conduct Rules 2.5 and 2.7. We order that Judge Hagar be suspended from his…

3Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against DemingWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Matter of SeamanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
  3. Judicial Qualifications Commission v. SchiradoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Judicial Qualifications Commission v. CieminskiNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  5. In Re Disciplinary Action Against McGuireNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API