State v. I. N.A.
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtDwyer, J.
*424¶1 It sometimes happens that a party's litigation transgressions are so repeated, and so significant, that justice does not allow for them to be ignored. Such is the case herein.
¶2 I.N.A., a first-time juvenile offender, was sentenced to a manifest injustice disposition of 24 to 32 weeks in total confinement. She appealed. We granted the appeal expedited status. But our review has been compromised by the transgressions of the prosecutor. First, the prosecutor did not timely act to obtain the proper entry of necessary findings of fact and conclusions of law. After our clerk of court ordered…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Miller v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- State v. Houston-SconiersWashington Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. O'DellWashington Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. RamosWashington Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. GambleWashington Supreme Court · 2010
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cowlitz Tribal Gaming Authority, App v. Clark County Sheriff's Office, RespsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
- Jason West v. State Of WashingtonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
- Pierce County v. Richard E. SorrelsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
- Richard Sorrels, Rcjs Properties, Llc v. Pierce CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
- State Of Washington v. G. D.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.