Legal Opinion

Rohrer v. Knudson

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 2009No. DA 08-0142PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Mcgrath

¶1 Bruce and Irene Rohrer (Rohrers) appeal from a judgment of the Eighth Judicial District Court, Cascade County, entered after a jury verdict denying them recovery on their Montana Consumer Protection Act claims, and apportioning negligence 10% to Defendant Gary Knudson (Knudson), 45% to (settled) Defendant City of Great Falls, and 45% to Plaintiffs Rohrers. We reverse and remand for a new trial.

¶2 The Rohrers present the following issues for review:

¶3 Whether the District Court abused its discretion in prohibiting the Rohrers from presenting evidence of differential settlement damage to…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Federal Trade Commission v. Sperry & Hutchinson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Robinson v. Toyota Motor Credit Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Gray v. North Carolina Insurance UnderwritingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  4. Cheshire Mortgage Service, Inc. v. MontesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  5. PNR, Inc. v. Beacon Property Management, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2003

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Jacobsen v. Allstate InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Keegan v. American Honda Motor Co.District Court, C.D. California · 2012
  3. Morrow v. Bank of America, N.A.Montana Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Stevenson v. Felco Industries, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Asrc Energy Services Power v. Golden Valley Electric Ass'nAlaska Supreme Court · 2011

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API