Rohrer v. Knudson
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Mcgrath
¶1 Bruce and Irene Rohrer (Rohrers) appeal from a judgment of the Eighth Judicial District Court, Cascade County, entered after a jury verdict denying them recovery on their Montana Consumer Protection Act claims, and apportioning negligence 10% to Defendant Gary Knudson (Knudson), 45% to (settled) Defendant City of Great Falls, and 45% to Plaintiffs Rohrers. We reverse and remand for a new trial.
¶2 The Rohrers present the following issues for review:
¶3 Whether the District Court abused its discretion in prohibiting the Rohrers from presenting evidence of differential settlement damage to…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Federal Trade Commission v. Sperry & Hutchinson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Robinson v. Toyota Motor Credit Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 2002
- Gray v. North Carolina Insurance UnderwritingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
- Cheshire Mortgage Service, Inc. v. MontesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- PNR, Inc. v. Beacon Property Management, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2003
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Jacobsen v. Allstate InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2009
- Keegan v. American Honda Motor Co.District Court, C.D. California · 2012
- Morrow v. Bank of America, N.A.Montana Supreme Court · 2014
- Stevenson v. Felco Industries, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2009
- Asrc Energy Services Power v. Golden Valley Electric Ass'nAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.