Paddack v. Pardee
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Oakland Circuit Court in Chancery. Paddack filed a bill in the circuit court against Pardee, to settle a question of right in regard to a water power, and to quiet his title to certain premises connected with it. A decree having been made in his favor, Pardee appealed to this court. The case is fully stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
By the court,
Miles, J.
The complainant being-, as he alleges, seized in fee and possessed of a valuable water power, with a dam and race, on the Clinton river, on the N. W. and S. W. quarters of section 28, in town S north of range 10 east, and upon which he now lias a woolen factory and a grist mill,'on the llth day of February, 1830, executed a conveyance by deed to the grantors of the defendant of a jiortion of the premises, under the following description: “A certain piece or parcel of land situate in out lot number ten, in the village of Pontiac, being a part of the north-west quarter of…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Negaunee Iron Co. v. Iron Cliffs Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1903
- Plano Manufacturing Co. v. EllisMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Vary v. SheaMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
- Purlo Corp. v. 3925 Woodward Avenue, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1954
- Stuart v. WordenMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.