Dasovich v. Longacre
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
I am not in accord with the holding of Mr. Justice NORTH that Gertrude Dasovich was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law.
The trial court directed a verdict in favor of defendant at the conclusion of plaintiff's case. It is a fundamental rule that where the court has directed a verdict against plaintiff on the ground of contributory negligence as a matter of law the evidence must be viewed in the light most favorable to plaintiff. SeeLane v. B J Theatres, Inc., 314 Mich. 666.
It is also the rule that a party is not required to make his case by a single witness. See Bullen v.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Lane v. B & J Theatres, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1946
- Bullen v. Wakefield Crushed Stone Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1926
3Cited by12 opinions
- Davis v. New York Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
- Routhier v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
- Staunton v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
- Knoellinger v. HenslerMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
- Fitzpatrick v. RitzenheinMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.