Legal Opinion

Palmer v. Mayor and Board of Aldermen

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 28, 1940No. 35799PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAND, Justice.

Plaintiff, widow of C. W. Palmer, and a resident of the Town of Ponchatoula, Parish of Tangipahoa, alleges that she is the owner of an undivided half interest in and to Lots 1 and 16 of Square 50 of the Town of Ponchatoula, with frontage of 400 feet on Oak Street, between Fourth and Fifth Streets, and that these lots are assessed at $150 each.

The present suit has been brought by plaintiff for the purpose of annulling all proceedings had by the Mayor and Board of Aldermen of the Town of Ponchatoula for the issuance of certain paving certificates, under the provisions of Act 92 of…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Davidson v. New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Norwood v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. French v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
  4. McMillen v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  5. Wight v. DavidsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1901

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wright v. HarborLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966
  2. City of Alexandria v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1961
  3. Bell v. City of ShreveportSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1958
  4. State Ex Rel. Louisiana Sav. Bank & Trust Co. v. Board of Sup'rs of Louisiana State UniversitySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1942
  5. Cart v. City of JenningsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1946

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API