Legal Opinion

Gardner v. Bank of Pinehurst

District Court, M.D. North Carolina

Decided October 4, 1940Published

1Opinion of the Court

HAYES, District Judge.

Each of the plaintiffs instituted an action against the defendant to recover $12,500 damages for malicious prosecution. Each plaintiff is a citizen and resident of South Carolina and the defendant is a North Carolina banking corporation, chartered under the laws of North Carolina, with its principal place of business at Pinehurst, in the Middle District of North Carolina.

A pretrial conference was held in Rockingham, N. C., September 3, 1940, at which time the cases were, by consent, consoli-. •dated and certain stipulations were entered as appear of record. Neither party…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Wheeler v. NesbittSupreme Court of the United States · 1861
  3. Morgan v. . StewartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  4. National Surety Co. v. PageCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1932
  5. Railroad Co. v. Hardware Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API