Legal Opinion

Shehan v. I. Tanenbaum, Son & Co.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 25, 1913PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas of Baltimore City (Elliott, J.) . The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtConstable, J.

The appellee, a foreign corporation, applied to the insurance commissioner to issue to it an insurance broker’s license “in its own valuable corporate name.” under section 200 of Art. 23, Code (1904). The commissioner refused to issue the license, upon the ground that the laws of the State did not authorize him to issue licenses to any but natural persons and to a bona fide co-partnership. Thereupon the appellee filed a petition asking that the writ of mandamus might issue, to compel the commissioner to issue such a license to it. Epon hearing had, the .Court passed an order directing the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chesapeake & Ohio Canal Co. v. Baltimore & Ohio Rail RoadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1832
  2. Mincher v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1886
  3. Clark v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1868
  4. Shaw v. LynesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1683
  5. Broadway & Locust Point Ferry Co. v. HankeyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1869

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Goldsmith v. Manufacturers' Liability InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1918
  2. State Tax Commission v. HarringtonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1915
  3. Telis v. TelisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1942
  4. Keller v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1914
  5. Wesbecker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API