United States v. Charles Sawyer, Jr.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BAZELON, Chief Judge:
The sole question presented by this appeal is whether defense counsel in a criminal case, in summation to the jury, has the right to relate his factual argument to the governing principles of law.
Appellant was found in possession of a number of items that had recently been taken from a locked car. In accordance with the applicable law, the jury was instructed that it was permissible, but not necessary, to infer from the fact of possession that he had stolen the property. 1 Appellant introduced no evidence, but sought to persuade the jury to reject the inference. He was…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Cross v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
- William J. Gass v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
- Willie E. Pendergrast v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
- State v. GilbertIdaho Supreme Court · 1943
- United States v. Michael Mitchell BeardenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- United States v. Neal T. Roberts and James Albert RobisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Robert C. MardianCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- United States v. John A. KramerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Zvonko Busic, Julienne Busic, Petar Matanic, Frane PesutCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Willie HortonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.