Legal Opinion

Cahoo v. SAS Analytics Inc.

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided May 4, 2021No. 2:17-cv-10657Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION PATTI JO CAHOO, KRISTEN MENDYK, KHADIJA COLE, HYON PAK, and MICHELLE DAVISON, Plaintiffs, Case Number 17-10657 v. Honorable David M. Lawson FAST ENTERPRISES LLC, CSG GOVERNMENT SOLUTIONS, STEPHEN GESKEY, SHEMIN BLUNDELL, DORIS MITCHELL, DEBRA SINGLETON, and SHARON MOFFET-MASSEY, Defendants. __________________________________________/ OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTIONS TO INTERVENE Three individuals, Michael Bell, Carmelita Colvin, and Suzette Marie Heathcote, have moved to intervene as plaintiffs in this case. They…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Crown, Cork & Seal Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. United Airlines, Inc. v. McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. New York v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Rodriguez v. Tennessee Laborers Health & Welfare FundCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API