Legal Opinion

In Re Compensation of Cayton

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 4, 2009No. 0605262 A136188PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

220 P.3d 1190 (2009)

231 Or. App. 644

In the Matter of the COMPENSATION OF Anthony D. CAYTON, Claimant.

Anthony D. Cayton, Petitioner,

v.

Safelite Glass Corporation, Respondent.

0605262; A136188.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted June 24, 2009.

Decided November 4, 2009.

Ronald A. Fontana, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Fontana & Takaro, P.C.

Benjamin C. Debney argued the cause for respondent. On the brief was Sommer Tolleson.

Before HASELTON, Presiding Judge, and ARMSTRONG, Judge, and ROSENBLUM, Judge.

ROSENBLUM, J.

Claimant seeks review of an order of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Meltebeke v. Bureau of Labor and IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Bronson v. MoonenOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Friends of Yamhill County v. Yamhill CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  5. State v. BlairCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cayton v. Safelite Glass Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  2. Cayton v. Safelite Glass Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  3. Giltner v. SAIFCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  4. Giltner v. SAIFCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API