Legal Opinion
Northern Kentucky Telephone Co. v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.
District Court, E.D. Kentucky
Decided October 14, 1931No. 3939PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COCHRAN, District Judge.
This action is before me on the motion of the defendant Cincinnati & Suburban Bell Telephone Company,- to dismiss the action as to it, and to quash and set aside the return of *108the marshal as to serviee. It is alleged, and it sufficiently appears, that this defendant transacts business in this district. This being so, this court has jurisdiction of the action as to this defendant, and it can be brought before the court by the serviee of process in Ohio. According to the return of the marshal, serviee thereof was had on the president of the defendant, but it is claimed…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern Photo Materials Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Rosenberg Bros. & Co. v. Curtis Brown Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Bank of America v. Whitney Central National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Southwark Foundry & Machine Co. v. Franz Foundry & Machine Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1931
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hansen Packing Co. v. Armour & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1936
- Don George, Inc. v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1951
- Phillip Gall & Son v. GARCIA CORPORATIONDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1972
- National Foundry Co. of New York, Inc. v. Alabama Pipe Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1934