Legal Opinion
People v. De Zimm
New York County Courts
Decided November 22, 1981PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*754OPINION OF THE COURT
Betty D. Friedlander, J.
Defendant makes three arguments in his motion to set aside the verdict pursuant to CPL 330.30. For the reasons outlined below, the court rejects each of the defendant’s arguments and therefore denies defendant’s motion.(1) First, defendant argues that he was denied due process of law by the prosecution’s failure to record, preserve and disclose the substance of the conversation with defendant which, according to the testimony of the other participant, the State Police investigator who was wired for sound at the time of the transaction, resulted in…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- United States v. AugenblickSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- People v. McGeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- People v. SugdenNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hambsch v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- State v. CrabbIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984
- State v. GaryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- People v. WeinsteinNew York Supreme Court · 1992
- People v. GarciaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993