Legal Opinion

Niccoli v. Monarch Life Insurance

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 5, 1975PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum. The policy of insurance covered plaintiff’s occupation as physician and surgeon. There was evidence that plaintiff was disabled from performing his responsibilities as a surgeon during the two-year period .insured by the policy. What remained then was an issue of fact whether plaintiff’s disability satisfied the policy standard defining "total disability” as the "complete inability of the Insured to engage in his regular occupation.” Under an adequate charge the jury found that there was such disability. The Appellate Division having affirmed, the issue of fact is beyond review in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McGrail v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
  2. Kingsland v. Erie County Agricultural SocietyNew York Court of Appeals · 1949

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Paul Shapiro, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Berkshire Life Insurance Company, Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
  2. Dawes v. First Unum Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994
  3. Robert Goldberger v. Paul Revere Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  4. Brumer v. National Life of VermontDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1995
  5. Klein v. National Life of VermontDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API