Legal Opinion
Francisco v. Affiliated Urologists
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided August 16, 2024No. CV-23-0152-PRPublished
1Opinion of the Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA DAVID FRANCISCO, ET AL., Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. AFFILIATED UROLOGISTS LTD, ET AL. Defendants/Appellees. No. CV-23-0152-PR Filed August 16, 2024 Appeal from the Superior Court in Maricopa County The Honorable James D. Smith, Judge (Ret.) No. CV2020-010470 AFFIRMED Memorandum Decision of the Court of Appeals, Division One No. 1 CA-CV 21-0701 Filed May 23, 2023 VACATED COUNSEL: Jason M. Kelly (argued), Richard D. Lyons, Kelly & Lyons, PLLC, Scottsdale, Attorneys for David Francisco and Kimberley Francisco Eileen Dennis GilBride (argued), Cristina…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Natale v. Camden County Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- Sanzari v. RosenfeldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- Summerfield v. Superior Court, Maricopa Cty.Arizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Barrio v. San Manuel Division Hospital for Magma Copper Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Seisinger v. SiebelArizona Supreme Court · 2009
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.