Legal Opinion
Matthew Jones v. Crisis Intervention Services
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided April 19, 2017No. 17-1584UnpublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION *
2Per curiam
Proceeding pro se, Mathew Jones filed this civil rights action against Crisis Intervention Services (“CIS”) and the Delaware State Police (collectively, “Defendants”). Jones supplemented his pleading with a document titled “Amendment to Complaint Form: Additional Page(s).” We refer to those filings together as “the Complaint.”
Jones alleged in the Complaint that he has been “feloniously” diagnosed with schizophrenia. He alleged further that on December 12, 2015, employees of Defendants arrived at Jones’s home, placed him in Handcuffs, and transported him to a 24-hour crisis center…
3Cases cited8 opinions
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Fowler v. UPMC SHADYSIDECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewer Authority v. Metcalf & Eddy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Great Western Mining & Mineral Co. v. Fox Rothschild LLPCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Burkey v. MarberryCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by6 opinions
- Fedder v. KesterDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2025
- JONES v. TRENTON NEW JERSEY POLICE DEPARTMENTDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2024
- Local Home Care Partners, LLC v. Home Care and Staffing Solutions, LLCSuperior Court of Delaware · 2025
- Matthew Jones v. Crisis Intervention ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- Showell v. QuinteroDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.