Legal Opinion

Matthew Jones v. Crisis Intervention Services

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided April 19, 2017No. 17-1585Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION *

2Per curiam

Proceeding pro se, Mathew Jones filed suit against Crisis Intervention Services (“CIS”) in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware. Listing five separate incidents in 2015, Jones claimed that CIS, among other purportedly unlawful acts, falsely diagnosed him with mental illnesses, improperly removed Jones from his home, and administered medication to him without consent. 1 For a cause of action, Jones relied on state tort law, federal criminal statutes, and the First and Eighth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution. For relief, Jones sought “$1,00,000 [sic].”

CIS moved to…

3Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Fowler v. UPMC SHADYSIDECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
  3. Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewer Authority v. Metcalf & Eddy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Great Western Mining & Mineral Co. v. Fox Rothschild LLPCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
  5. Linda RS v. Richard D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API