Legal Opinion

Dalzell v. Kelly

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 23, 1952No. Civ. 19401PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.

This matter involves only costs on appeal. It comes here after plaintiff had obtained a reversal by the Fourth Appellate District of the judgment in his action with an award of “costs on appeal.” After he had caused an execution to be levied by the sheriff, that officer entered a full satisfaction of the judgment for such costs. Thereupon, plaintiff moved the trial court to vacate the sheriff’s entry. From the trial court’s order denying such motion, plaintiff appeals.

After the remittitur had been filed on July 9, 1951, plaintiff filed his cost bill on July 30. Pursuant to a motion to retax…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Estate of WunderleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Los Angeles Rock & Gravel Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Stockton Theatres, Inc. v. PalermoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Bank of Idaho v. Pine Avenue AssociatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  3. Lucky United Properties Investment, Inc. v. LeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. People v. SumnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. Lucky United Properties Investment, Inc. v. LeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API