Prado v. Allied Domecq Spirits & Wine Group Disability Income Policy
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION, FINDINGS OF FACT, AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
SAMUEL CONTI, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Antonio Prado (“Prado” or “Plaintiff’) commenced this action against the Allied Domecq Spirits and Wine Group Disability Income Policy (“Allied” or “the Plan”), bringing three causes of action: (1) failure to extend disability benefits in accordance with the Plan and the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1132; (2) violation of section 10111.2 of California’s Insurance Code; and (3) failure to produce records under 29 U.S.C. § 1132(c) and 29…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Abatie v. Alta Health & Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Rex T. KEARNEY, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Welch v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Don Ray Smith v. Cmta-Iam Pension TrustCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Filarsky v. Life Ins. Co. of N. Am.District Court, N.D. California · 2019
- Anderson v. Liberty Mutual Long Term Disability PlanDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2015
- Gill v. Bausch & Lomb Supplemental Retirement Income Plan IDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2014
- Gonzales v. Unum Life Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2012
- Davis v. Einstein Noah Restaurant Group, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2022
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.