Legal Opinion

Valley Transit Co. v. Lopez

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 18, 1953No. 12556PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellee, Refugio Lopez, has filed a motion to strike the transcript and statement of facts and to dismiss the appeal because the record was not filed within the time allowed by Rule 386, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure.

The facts are as follows:'

On October 24, 1952, judgment was rendered on the verdict of the jury.

Prior thereto, on October 6, 1952, appellant Ernest E. Marroquin had filed his motion for a new trial, which was in fact prematurely filed.

On November 3, 1952, appellant Valley Transit Company, Inc., filed its original motion for a new trial.

On December 4, 1952, appellant Valley…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Dallas Storage & Warehouse Co. v. TaylorTexas Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Independent Life Insurance Co. of America v. WorkTexas Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Hughes Tool Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1945
  4. National Labor Relations Board v. North American Aviation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1943
  5. Texas Livestock Marketing Ass'n v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Chekanski v. Texas & New Orleans RailroadCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
  2. Miller v. EsunasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
  3. Arana v. GallegosCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
  4. Cathcart v. ChildersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  5. Wyche v. Bank of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API