Lipshay v. Barr
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRosellini, J.
This is a personal injury action, in which the jury was instructed to return a verdict for the plaintiff. The jury awarded damages in the amount of two thousand dollars, whereupon the plaintiffs moved for a new trial on the issue of damages only, contending that the amount of the verdict was so inadequate that it could only have been the result of passion and prejudice. Error is assigned to the denial of this motion.
Granting or denying a new trial on the ground of inadequacy of damages is peculiarly within the discretion of the trial judge, and the supreme court will not disturb his ruling in…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Daigle v. RudebeckWashington Supreme Court · 1929
- Swanson v. SewallWashington Supreme Court · 1935
- Hopper v. GallantWashington Supreme Court · 1955
3Cited by12 opinions
- Cox v. Charles Wright Academy, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1967
- Balandzich v. DemerotoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
- Mullin v. Builders Development & Finance Service, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1963
- Capen v. WesterWashington Supreme Court · 1961
- Cowan v. JensenWashington Supreme Court · 1971
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.