Legal Opinion

Chamberland v. Labonte

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided February 6, 2007No. AC 25799PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PETERS, J.

General Statutes § 31-293a creates an exception to the general rule that workers’ compensation benefits provide the exclusive remedy for an employee injured by a fellow employee.1 Under this *466statutory exception, an injured coworker may pursue a common-law action if “the action is based on the fellow employee’s negligence in the operation of a motor vehicle . . . .” General Statutes § 31-293a. In this case, we must decide whether “operation of a motor vehicle” encompasses the negligent activation of a hydraulic system to move garbage in the back of a stationary garbage truck.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. 2830 Whitney Avenue Corp. v. Heritage Canal Development Associates, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1994
  2. Dias v. AdamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  3. Colangelo v. HeckelmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  4. Zbras v. St. Vincent's Medical CenterConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  5. Fields v. GironConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Chamberland v. LabonteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  2. Cherisme v. Mohegan Tribal Gaming AuthorityMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API