Chamberland v. Labonte
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PETERS, J.
General Statutes § 31-293a creates an exception to the general rule that workers’ compensation benefits provide the exclusive remedy for an employee injured by a fellow employee.1 Under this *466statutory exception, an injured coworker may pursue a common-law action if “the action is based on the fellow employee’s negligence in the operation of a motor vehicle . . . .” General Statutes § 31-293a. In this case, we must decide whether “operation of a motor vehicle” encompasses the negligent activation of a hydraulic system to move garbage in the back of a stationary garbage truck.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- 2830 Whitney Avenue Corp. v. Heritage Canal Development Associates, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- Dias v. AdamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Colangelo v. HeckelmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Zbras v. St. Vincent's Medical CenterConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Fields v. GironConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Chamberland v. LabonteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Cherisme v. Mohegan Tribal Gaming AuthorityMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court · 2014