Legal Opinion
C.S. v. L.K.M.
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided April 1, 2002No. 24364PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALMON H. MAUS, Senior Judge.
By a Default Administrative Order, the Division of Child Support Enforcement (“DCSE”) determined that Petitioner was the father of and obligated to support two children. § 454.470, RSMo 2000. By this action, Petitioner seeks the declaration of the court that he is not the father of the youngest of the two children named in the *854Administrative Order.1 DCSE filed an answer to the original petition. This answer incorporated a copy of the relevant Notice and Finding of Financial Responsibility (hereafter referred to as “the Notice”), the Default Administrative Order and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Grannis v. OrdeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Roller v. HollySupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- State Ex Rel. Williams v. MarshSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Arbogast v. City of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
- JIMMY KENT RIGGINS, Petitioner-Respondent v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUEMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015