Legal Opinion

(PS) Engel v. Client Security Fund Commission of the State Bar of CA

District Court, E.D. California

Decided October 12, 2021No. 2:21-cv-00624Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JULIUS M. ENGEL, No. 2:21-cv-0624 DB PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 CLIENT SECURITY FUND ORDER COMMISSION OF THE CALIFORNIA 15 STATE BAR, 16 Defendant. 17 18 Plaintiff Julius Engel is proceeding in this action pro se. On July 14, 2021, this action was 19 reassigned to the undersigned pursuant to the parties’ consent to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction 20 under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1). (ECF No. 10.) Pending before the court is defendant’s motion to 21 dismiss submitted on August 2, 2021. (ECF No. 14.) For the…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API