Legal Opinion
Miller v. W.H. Bristow, Inc.
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided May 31, 1990No. Civ. A. 4:89-2668-15PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HAMILTON, District Judge.
1. Introduction
Plaintiff, Loren D. Miller, sells motor fuels and groceries at a retail service station in Darlington County, South Carolina. The property is owned by Ruth Borders and was leased to Bekms Corporation on February 1, 1983. Bekms assigned the lease to defendant W.H. Bristow, Inc. (Bris-tow) who then subleased the property to plaintiff. Bristow is a petroleum marketer who uses a variety of methods to sell fuel to the public. The method employed with respect to Miller is called a “retail consignment basis,” under which Bristow places gasoline and diesel…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Dr. Miles Medical Co. v. John D. Park & Sons Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Federal Trade Commission v. Sperry & Hutchinson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Albrecht v. Herald Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Simpson v. Union Oil Co. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Federal Trade Commission v. Motion Picture Advertising Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Wingard v. Exxon Co., U.S.A.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1992
- Douglas v. Petroleum Wholesale, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2005
- Karak v. Bursaw Oil Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2001
- DKH Corp. v. Rankin-Patterson Oil Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
- Dunlap v. Schrader Oil Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.