Legal Opinion

Woodward v. Cave

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 11, 1908No. 6856PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Before Hydrich, J., Barnw-ell, Spring Tema, 1907. Action by Edward' F. Woodward against Dizzie M. Cave. From judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. cites: Burden wm on plaintiff to show authority of T. S. Cme & Co-, to- bind! defendant: 3'9 S'. C, 554; 17 S. €., 338; 53 S. €., 114. cite: Agency may be proved by agent: 137 Ind., 197; 33 Am. D., 724.

1Opinion of the Court

T'he opinion of the Court was delivered ¡by

Mr. Justice Jones.

The complaint in this action alleged that on the l'3th day of June, 1900, plaintiff traded defendant a horse 'worth $175 for a mare and' agreed to give $100' to hoot, 'giving three notes to defendant for said sum which were secured! 'by a 'chattel mortgage on- the miare; that defendant warranted the mare to be sound and safe for ladies to drive, ¡and not over six years old; that she was unsound, dangerous to drive, refused -to work and was ¡over six years old. That notwithstanding defendant knew said warranty to be false, she…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hicks v. Southern Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1902
  2. Fales & Jenks McH. Co. v. BrowningSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1903

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cogswell v. CannadySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  2. Dupuy v. WilliamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API