Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Santa Cruz Valley Unified School District No. 35

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 16, 1989No. 2 CA-CV 88-0267Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FERNANDEZ, Judge.

Appellant, a non-tenured teacher, was dismissed after the school board found six charges against him had been substantiated. On appeal, he contends that his dismissal was improper under the applicable statutes. We affirm.

Linden Roberts was a third grade teacher whose first year of employment with appellee Santa Cruz Valley Unified School District No. 35 was the 1986-87 school year. His contract was renewed for the 1987-88 school year. Subsequent to the renewal, allegations of misconduct were made against him and on May 26,1987, the school board served upon him a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fulton v. Dysart Unified School District No. 89Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
  2. Welch v. Bd. of Ed. of Chandler U. Sch. Dist.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  3. Wheeler v. Yuma School District No. OneArizona Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Fike v. Catalina Foothills School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API