Legal Opinion

Lamberson v. Love

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1911No. Docket No. 28PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Kalamazoo; Knappen, J. Assumpsit by Charles A. Lamberson and James C. Bogard against Charles M. Love. A judgment for defendant on a verdict directed by the court is reviewed by plaintiffs on writ of error.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAlvay, J.

Plaintiffs were guarantors or sureties for one George Love to secure the faithful performance of a certain contract between him and a medical company, which had agreed to furnish him as its salesman certain medicines, extracts, etc., upon certain terms and condi*461tions, and for which he agreed to pay in time and manner provided in the written contract, George Love defaulted in the performance of this contract to the amount of $680.41. Later suit was brought against him and his sureties, upon this contract to recover this amount. George Love left for parts unknown. He is the son of the…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Anamoose National Bank v. DockterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Schram v. SpivackDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API