Legal Opinion

Roventini v. First Judicial District Court

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided November 16, 1965No. 4990PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Thompson, J.:

This is an original proceeding in mandamus by which the petitioner, Roventini, seeks to compel the District Court to set aside a clerk’s entry of default in a tort action for damages. We rule that the extraordinary remedy of mandamus is not here available and refuse to issue the writ.1

*605A writ of mandamus may issue to compel the performance of an act which the law especially enjoins as a duty resulting from office, if there is not a plain, speedy, and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law. NRS 34.160-34.170. The permissible exercise of discretion by a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hotel Last Frontier Corp. v. Frontier Properties, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Dzack v. MarshallNevada Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Wilmurth v. First Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Pinana v. Second Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1959
  5. State ex rel. Weber v. McFaddenNevada Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Laborers' Int'l. Union of N. America, Local 169 v. Office of the Labor Comm'r.Nevada Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Sturrock v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Sturrock v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Sturrock v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API