United States v. James
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Rulo to punish James G. James and Gordon McLeod for contempt of court in refusing to answer questions asked by the grand jury. Rule discharged.
1Opinion of the Court
GROSSOUP, District Judge.
The grand jurors report to the court that, on the 16th day of February instant, they were duly engaged in inquiring into certain alleged violations, in this district and division, of the interstate commerce act by the Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Company, and other railroads and common carriers, and *258that James G. James, being before them in response to a subpoena as a witness, and being inquired of respecting Ms knowledge of the sMpment of certain products from CMcago east at a less freight rate than was named in the open tariffs then in force, declined to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Counselman v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- United States v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1833
- People v. . SharpNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- People Ex Rel. Hackley v. KellyNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
- Emery's caseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. BellU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Tennessee · 1897
- State Ex Rel. Hemming v. ColemanSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
- Brown v. WalkerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania · 1895
- Shaw v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1910
- Ullmann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.