Legal Opinion
McKinnon v. Doctor's Associates, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided March 29, 1991No. 2:91-cv-70333PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DUGGAN, District Judge.
I. Factual Background
This case arises out of a dispute between a franchisor, Doctor’s Associates, Inc., (“DAI”) as well as the various other named defendants, and franchisees David and Diane McKinnon. (These defendants will be referred to collectively as DAI in this opinion). DAI is a franchisor of Subway submarine sandwich shops. DAI had been sued by the Michigan Attorney General’s Office for failure to comply with certain provisions of the Michigan Franchise Investment Law. Under the terms of a consent judgment DAI was to offer recision to any franchisee who…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Regis Associates v. Rank Hotels (Management) LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Bedell v. H.R.C. Ltd.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1981
- Atlanta, K. & N. Ry. Co. v. Southern Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1904
- Bolivar Sand Co., Inc. v. Allied Equipment, Inc.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1986
- Rose v. GiamattiDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Moore v. Permanente Medical Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Moore v. Permanente Medical Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Fain v. Biltmore Securities, Inc.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 1996
- MG Building Materials, Ltd. v. Paychex, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2012
- Hernandez-Lopez v. Com. of Puerto RicoDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.