Legal Opinion

Bloomfield v. Employment Division

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 21, 1976No. 76-3133 SUA, CA 5844PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFort, J.

The Employment Appeals Board reversed the referee and found that claimant did not have good cause for leaving work and should be denied benefits under ORS 657.176(2)(c).1 The board also found that claimant was not actively seeking work and was not available for work during 7 of the 13 weeks that she was unemployed. ORS 657.155(1)(c).2 Claimant appeals on both questions.

Claimant had worked for nine years as a salesperson for a firm selling interior decorations and as a manager of other salespeople for seven and one-half of those years. She testified that she had done well financially in 1973…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Grigsby v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  2. Evjen v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gray v. Department of Employment SecurityUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Wallace v. Department of Employment SecurityCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988
  3. Hurst v. Board of Review of the Ind. Com'nUtah Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Gray v. Department of Employment SecurityUtah Supreme Court · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API