Legal Opinion
Coniglario v. Hanover Ins. Co.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided April 5, 1989PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
233 N.J. Super. 627 (1989)
559 A.2d 875
JOHN CONIGLARIO, PLAINTIFF,
v.
HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division Middlesex County.
Decided April 5, 1989.
Evan L. Goldman, for defendant, Hanover Insurance Company.
David New, for plaintiff (Herbert New & David New).
LONGHI, J.S.C.
This is an action by an insured against his automobile insurance carrier seeking to obtain money damages under both the uninsured (UM) and underinsured motorist coverage (UIM) provisions of his policy. The matter comes before the court on cross motions for partial summary judgment. The…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Longworth v. Van HoutenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
3Cited by4 opinions
- Green v. Selective Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
- American States Insurance v. FrostNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
- Hesser v. Harleysville-Garden State InsuranceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996
- Green v. Selective Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996