Legal Opinion · Dissent

Commonwealth v. Fenton

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 13, 1989No. 439, 440Published

1DissentPopovich, Judge

I respectfully dissent. This appeal presents an opportunity to interpret the gradation section of the escape statute, 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 5121. To resolve this appeal correctly, I believe it is necessary to address an issue raised in appellant’s post-verdict motions but not directly argued on appeal. Following his guilty plea on the felonious escape charge, the appellant filed a motion to withdraw his plea and a motion to modify sentence. Therein, the appellant alleged, inter alia, that the escape charge was, in fact, a misdemeanor of the second degree not a felony of the third degree; thus, his…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ShafferSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Commonwealth v. VanceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Commonwealth v. GlazeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Commonwealth v. WestSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Commonwealth v. MiddletonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API