Legal Opinion

In Re Flo-Lizer, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided October 5, 1989No. Bankruptcy C2-89-0560PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

GRAHAM, District Judge.

Appellant, The United States of America, filed this appeal from a May 18, 1989 order of the United States Bankruptcy Court sustaining the objection of debtor Flo-lizer, Inc. (“Flo-lizer”) to the claim of the Internal Revenue Service (“I.R.S.”) for administrative expenses.

This case originated in the United States Bankruptcy Court as a Chapter 11 bankruptcy filed by the debtor on April 30,1986. The United States became involved in this case on behalf of the I.R.S. when the debt- or objected to the administrative expense claims which the I.R.S. had filed…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Finley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Fourco Glass Co. v. Transmirra Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Nicholas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Al Copeland Enterprises, Inc., Debtors. Al Copeland Enterprises, Inc. v. State of TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
  2. In Re Flo-Lizer, Inc., Debtor. United States of America v. Flo-Lizer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  3. Matter of Peter DelGrande Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1992
  4. Al Copeland Enterprises, Inc. v. Texas (In Re Al Copeland Enterprises, Inc.)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
  5. Sanchez Energy CorporationUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API