Legal Opinion

Woodstock Iron Works v. Standard Pulley Mfg. Co.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided December 18, 1905No. 15,746PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Civil District Court, Parish of Orleans; Walter Byers Sommerville, Judge. Action by the Woodstock Iron Works against the Standard Pulley Manufacturing Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Statement of tlj^ Case.

BREAUX, C. J.

Plaintiff sues the defendant to recover the sum of $3,890, with 5 per cent, interest from July 6, 1904, for alleged damages growing out of, as plaintiff alleges, defendant’s neglect to order the shipment of the remainder of the iron deliverable under contracts entered into between plaintiffs and defendant.

There were three of these contracts bearing the same date, viz., 20th November, 1902.

In the first the plaintiff agreed to sell to the defendant 100 tons of No. 3 foundry Woodstock pig iron for the price of $1,900.50. In the second contract 200 tons of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Vance v. TourneSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1839
  2. Wilbor v. M'GillicuddySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1832
  3. Camors v. MaddenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1884
  4. Moreau v. ChauvinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1844
  5. Enders v. Gingras, Mulhaupt & Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1886

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hafner Mfg. Co. v. Lieber Lumber & Shingle Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1909
  2. Watson v. FeibelSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1916
  3. Southport Mill, Ltd. v. AnsleySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
  4. Gallaspy v. A. J. Ingersoll & Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1920
  5. Police Jury for Parish of St. Landry v. Alexandria Gravel Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1919

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API