Lance v. Pearce
Indiana Supreme Court
From th6 Gibson Circuit Court. .
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.
The appellant asks a reversal upon the ground that the evidence fails to prove some of the essential elements of the appellees’ case.
It is true that in order to recover upon a complaint for the value of goods sold and delivered, the plaintiff must prove a delivery, but it is not true that this must be done by direct evidence, for it may, like any other fact, be inferred from circumstances. As there was indirect evidence fully warranting the conclusions of the trial court upon this point, we can not disturb it.
The evidence shows that the goods were sold to the defendant, although they were…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Monarch Beverage Co. v. Indiana Department of State RevenueIndiana Tax Court · 1992
- Mackey v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1892
- Peyson v. ShellabargerNebraska Supreme Court · 1891
- Kamm v. ReesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1910
- Symons v. BurtonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.