Legal Opinion
Buyers & Renters United to Save Harlem v. Pinnacle Group N.Y. LLC
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 5, 2008No. 07 Civ. 6316(CM)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS THE AMENDED COMPLAINT
McMAHON, District Judge.
Plaintiffs allege that defendants Pinnacle and Joel Wiener (collectively, the “defendants”) have violated the RICO statute and the New York Consumer Protection Act (“NYCPA”) by demanding and collecting rents in amounts beyond those permitted under New York State law, with the goal of illegally increasing regulating rents and/or evicting tenants entitled to rent regulation. Plaintiffs seek a judgment from this Court providing (a) injunctive relief, (b) declaratory…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking UnlimitedSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Mills v. Polar Molecular Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Minnie Rose LLC v. YuDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- DeSilva v. North Shore-Long Island Jewish Health System, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2011
- Charron v. Pinnacle Group N.Y. LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Board of Managers of Beacon Tower Condominium v. 85 Adams Street, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Charron v. Pinnacle Group N.Y. LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.