Legal Opinion

Beeler v. Pennsylvania Threshermen & Farmers Insurance

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided November 1, 1960PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcAMIS, P. J.

The policy here in suit provides medical coverage for a member of the insured’s family made necessary by reason of bodily injuries accidentally sustained “while occupying or being struck by an automobile” but containing the following exclusion:

“This policy does not apply * * * to bodily injury * * * while occupying or being struck by a vehicle operated on rails or crawler-treads or a farm type tractor or other equipment designed for use principally off public roads, while not upon public roads. ’ ’

The plaintiff, while a member of the family of the named insured, was accidentally injured while…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Moore v. Life & Casualty InsuranceTennessee Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Ætna Life Ins. Co. of Hartford, Conn. v. BidwellTennessee Supreme Court · 1951
  3. State v. FreelsTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
  4. McDonald v. Life & Casualty Ins. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Wood v. PolkTennessee Supreme Court · 1873

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. HoladaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1970
  2. West v. Laminite Plastics Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1984
  3. Williams v. Cimarron Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Cora v. PattersonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. Members Mutual Insurance Company v. RandolphCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API