Legal Opinion
Beeler v. Pennsylvania Threshermen & Farmers Insurance
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
Decided November 1, 1960PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcAMIS, P. J.
The policy here in suit provides medical coverage for a member of the insured’s family made necessary by reason of bodily injuries accidentally sustained “while occupying or being struck by an automobile” but containing the following exclusion:
“This policy does not apply * * * to bodily injury * * * while occupying or being struck by a vehicle operated on rails or crawler-treads or a farm type tractor or other equipment designed for use principally off public roads, while not upon public roads. ’ ’
The plaintiff, while a member of the family of the named insured, was accidentally injured while…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Moore v. Life & Casualty InsuranceTennessee Supreme Court · 1931
- Ætna Life Ins. Co. of Hartford, Conn. v. BidwellTennessee Supreme Court · 1951
- State v. FreelsTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
- McDonald v. Life & Casualty Ins. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1935
- Wood v. PolkTennessee Supreme Court · 1873
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. HoladaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1970
- West v. Laminite Plastics Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1984
- Williams v. Cimarron Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1966
- Cora v. PattersonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
- Members Mutual Insurance Company v. RandolphCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.