City of Los Angeles v. Standard Oil Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMoss, J.
The complaint seeks a declaration that a statute enacted by the Legislature in 1964 relating to contribution among tortfeasors responsible for the Baldwin Hill Reservoir disaster in December 1963 1 is constitutional. Although several oil companies and other persons are named as defendants in the complaint, only respondent Standard Oil Company of California appeared in the action. The demurrer of respondent was sustained on the sole ground that the statute is unconstitutional in that it is special legislation based upon an invalid classification. The trial court entered a judgment declaring…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- United States v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Hollman v. WarrenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Heron v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Metropolitan Water Dist. v. MarquardtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Sacramento Municipal Utility District v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- City of Los Angeles v. City of ArtesiaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Heitz v. County of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978